Scenario PlanningBioR · Health Security
All scenarios

Biosecurity

Deliberate Release — Unattributed Biological Incident

An unusual cluster of a rare disease raises the question of intentional release.

Severe severity

Duration

150 min

Injects

5

Audience

National security council, public health, law enforcement, CBRN response

Situation

An unusual cluster of a rare, severe illness appears among people with a shared location but no shared social links. The causative agent is a select agent not normally seen in the region. It is unclear whether this is a natural outbreak, a laboratory escape, or a deliberate release. Public health and security responses must run in parallel without compromising each other.

Exercise objectives

  • Exercise the interface between public health response and criminal/national-security investigation.
  • Test how attribution uncertainty affects medical countermeasure and communication decisions.
  • Clarify legal authorities and chain-of-custody when a health event may be a crime.
  • Rehearse coordinated messaging that avoids panic and avoids prejudicing an investigation.

Capability stress

How hard this scenario tests each of the 10 benchmark dimensions (1–5).

Foresight lens

Readinessprecedent-free

Being able to cope with a threat that is precedent-free — a pathogen, dynamic or context we have NOT seen, where experience can actively mislead. Readiness is an adaptive capacity, not a plan for a known pattern.

TUNA profile

Turbulence
Present
Uncertainty
Dominant
Novelty
Strong
Ambiguity
Dominant

Assumptions this scenario windtunnelsfull register →

A9A biological event is a health event, not a security event.

Sensitivity: medium · TUNA: A

A1Surveillance will detect the next threat early enough to act on it.

Sensitivity: high · TUNA: N · U

Scenario parameters

Illustrative planning figures for discussion — not operational data.

Agent class

Rare select agent, atypical for the region

Presentation

Common-source epidemic curve, tight geographic focus

Person-to-person spread

Low/none for this agent (scenario-dependent)

Attribution at T0

Unknown — natural, accidental or deliberate all open

Countermeasure

Stockpiled prophylaxis exists; distribution untested at scale

Roles at the table

Health Incident Lead

Owns case management, prophylaxis and public health measures.

Law Enforcement Lead

Owns the criminal investigation and evidence chain-of-custody.

National Security Coordinator

Owns the attribution question and inter-agency coordination.

Public Health Laboratory Director

Balances rapid diagnosis with forensic sample integrity.

Communications Lead

Coordinates messaging across health and security without prejudicing either.

Inject timeline

  1. Day 0Unusual cluster

    Clinicians report several severe cases of a disease rarely seen locally.

  2. Day 1Agent identified

    The reference lab confirms a select agent atypical for the region.

  3. Day 2Common location

    Cases share a single public venue within a narrow time window.

  4. Day 3Anonymous claim

    An unverified online post claims responsibility, raising deliberate-release concerns.

  5. Day 5Second location signal

    A possible second exposure site is identified in another city.

Decision points

D1How do you run mass prophylaxis while preserving a potential crime scene and forensic evidence?

  • Public-health urgency vs. evidence integrity and chain-of-custody.
  • Pre-existing memoranda of understanding between health and law enforcement.
  • Who leads at the scene, and does everyone agree before the event?

D2What do you say publicly while attribution is unknown?

  • Avoiding both panic and complacency.
  • Not prejudicing an investigation or naming suspects.
  • Giving the public clear protective actions they can actually take.

Response playbook

Recognise

  • Confirm agent via reference lab
  • Preserve forensic samples
  • Convene joint health–security cell
  • Assess attribution openly

Protect

  • Distribute stockpiled prophylaxis
  • Define exposed cohort
  • Secure potential scenes
  • Issue clear protective guidance

Investigate & attribute

  • Run parallel epi + criminal investigation
  • Maintain chain-of-custody
  • Coordinate international notification
  • Align communications

After-action questions

  • At what point does a health event become a security event, and who decides?
  • Did the health and law-enforcement objectives ever conflict — and how was that resolved?
  • Was the countermeasure distribution plan actually exercised before today?

National benchmark references

Real national strategies from the Global Pandemic Preparedness Benchmark that inform this scenario.